University of Anbar
  • Register
  • Login
  • العربیة

ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 14, Issue 1
  3. Author

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Facts and Figures

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Using x-ray and FT-IR teqencue to study and comparative two methods of carbonate minerals removal

    Muhammod .A. Latef

ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2016, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 1-13

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

The objective of this study was to obtain the of best method carbonate removal from soil without effect in mineralogical properties. Three soil treatments for soil high content in calcite (Tall Keef region).Were used HCl acid (0.2N), sodium acetate pH (5) treatment and control treatment were conducted compared with control treatment.Results showed Bulk X-ray and XRDclay mineral were that use of HCl acid Caused to removal all carbonate without the effecting in quality and quantity of minerals Comparison with first treatment that it was not great influence. The group of mineral were diagnosed for the three treatments by using the Bulk x-ray showed dominate quartz,calcite,palygorskite,feldspar and kaolinite respectively,while the XRD for clay realated the rule of chlorite, illite,semctite and kaolinite respectively,as for FT-IR appearance group are bands important (1450 )cm-1,which represents carbonate group (dolomite-calcite)and Disappearance with third treatment without second,therefore acetate method is considered inappropriate for measurements which means to remove the carbonate. Meaning that use of HCl acid (0.2), N is optimum method.
Keywords:
    ray IR teqencue carbonate minerals removal
  • PDF
  • XML
(2016). Using x-ray and FT-IR teqencue to study and comparative two methods of carbonate minerals removal. ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 14(1), 1-13.
Muhammod .A. Latef. "Using x-ray and FT-IR teqencue to study and comparative two methods of carbonate minerals removal". ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 14, 1, 2016, 1-13.
(2016). 'Using x-ray and FT-IR teqencue to study and comparative two methods of carbonate minerals removal', ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 14(1), pp. 1-13.
Using x-ray and FT-IR teqencue to study and comparative two methods of carbonate minerals removal. ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2016; 14(1): 1-13.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 164
  • PDF Download: 104
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus